Hindu Nation-our right.

India is a secular country with about 80 percent of its population calling itself Hindu. Hindu-ism is recognized as the world’s third largest religion, First being christinaity and second being Islam. Although Hindu-ism is looked as upon as a religion, it can only be defined as   “A group of faiths rooted in the religious ideas of India.” About 15 percent of the people in the world are Hindus, and about that much people call themselves secular/non-religious/atheists too.

The first and second largest religions, viz Christianity and Islam is recogonised as the state religion in many countries of the world. For example, Vatican is a Christian state where no other religion exists and England is a secular state which has given official status to the angelical church. Almost all the countries which have more than Sixty percent population as muslims are theocratic non secular states. For example, Saudi Arabia is a sunni Islamic nation, while Iran is a shia Islamic nation. There are a good number of states for those who believe in no religion(secularism). There are a few communist and Buddhist countries also. But why there is no country which recognize Hindu-ism since 2006, when Nepal too was declared a secular state? Why should not Hindus have their own country, which protects them, which help them to compete with the powerful religions of the world?

India is a secular nation, and the word “secularism” was introduced into the constitution during 1976 when Smt Indira Gandhi was the prime minister. What was it before ? What was the need for stressing that we are “secular” and not a Hindu nation, as it is perceived internationally because of obvious cultural identity of ours? India, the land of Hindus have never closed the doors to any religious preacher at any point of time in the history. We have always welcomed jews, parsis , Christians and muslims. While jews and parsis lived happily with Hindus, Christianity and Islam had frequent issues with Hindus. The Islam and Christianity ruled the Hindu majority country for about 1000 years, First came Islam through Babar, then through British, Christianity. Still Islam and Christianity is minority religions in India. But they enjoy special rights in the name of “minority”. How come the religions which formed the ruling class of India for centuries be assumed as vulnerable to majority attacks on their faith? Secularism in India is defined as “sarva dharma samabhava”, but we have reservations and scholarships exclusively given to minorities. Since when secularism meant “giving special status to minorities”?

The secularism in India, in reality, is based on the assumption that the majority will impose their religion on the minorities and so the state must give special attention to minorities in this regard. But in a globalized world who is majority and minority?  Christianity and Islam together has  about more than fifty percent of people in the world. That means Hindus who are majority in India are a minority locally which is vulnerable, and victim of global majority, ie Christians and muslims. That further implies Hindus whose numbers are declining each day, should have one nation-state which they can trust. That further demands we need a Hindu nation.

What does Hindu nation mean? Is it something like Islamic countries, where the practice of other faith will lead you to dungeons? Or is it like England which recognize a angelical church? What will happen to non-Hindus of India ? What will happen to Muslims(India is second largest Muslim populated country  after Indonesia)?These are the questions which certainly demand answers.

The Rashtreeya SwayamSevak Sangh (RSS) is often accused by the Secularists as an organization which want to convert India into a HinduRashtra,a Hindu nation. They assume that in such a Hindu Rashtra minorities will be deported or persecuted; India will be like another theocratic state etc. But does RSS really want to make India a Hindu nation. The fact is RSS considers India as a Hindu nation, and it is quite clear from their prarthanas they sing in their daily Shakas. So India need not be like Islamic countries, nor like England, nor it need to send away the minorities, we only want India to recogonise itself as a Hindu nation, officially.  We Hindus have the right to demand a Home and we need it soon. We cannot live like beggars in footpaths of secularism. We have the right to live and livelihood, and we need a government which will ensure that we are not killed by dacoits of other religions.

Is not Congress-Media-NGO combo responsible for Gujarat Riots 2002 ?

SIT gives clean chit to Modi, the news broke today noon. We all knew it, but we want to hear it from SIT which was independent and under the supervision of Honourable Supreme Court of India. Just like we knew that Modi was innocent, some people like Teesta Setelvad knew he was guilt. But the Law also like we the people, presumes innocence until proven guilty. In legal terminology it is said as “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat”. But the media, congress and certain NGO have just reversed this maxim and are bent on seeing every one who supports  Modi, his governance and development policies guilty of what they call Gujarat Anti Muslim Pogrom. We all are guilty till Narendra Modi is proven innocent, and the Modi is not innocent even if proven innocent.

We can not allow this hate campaign against a person who is re elected again for his good governance, so this SIT report should stop all these smear campaigning. All these years Media-Congress-NGO combos were asking Narendra Modi to apologise, now it is our chance to ask when they are going to apologize !! They should not only apologize to Narendra Modi but to the whole nation for several reasons.

While going through tweets about SIT report, I noticed an old article from Times Of India , which read as follows

“

The Congress has been goingto town over Best Bakery and other instances of the Narendra Modi government’s complicity in the anti-Muslim violence which shook Gujarat last year.  But when it comes to the involvement of its own party cadre in the killings, 10 Janpath maintains a deafening silence. Even when confronted by a long-standing ally from the freedom movement days, the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind. According to the JUH, “most Congress corporators” and some Congress leaders of Gujarat had actively participated in last year’s riots.  Mahmood As’ad Madani, JUH general secretary told The Times of India: “We wrote letters to Congress president Sonia Gandhi, gave a list of Congress leaders involved in the riots, asked her to take action against them but to no avail……………“

So there ARE allegations against many CONGRESS corporators and Congress leaders of Gujarat in what they call Anti Muslim Pogrom and till date no action has been taken by the High Command, and media has never debated this angle too.? So taking this allegations into account and also the very well known fact that Mehmud H Kalota, Salim A G Sheikh, Abdul R A M Ghantia, Farroukh Bhana and Haji Bilal(convicts in Godhra Train Carnage) were  five Congress members/supporters. can we make some assumptions ? There was a congress HAND in both Godhra Train Burning and Post Godhra Riots. So was it a congress attempt to destabilize the BJP Government in Gujarat ? This may be a mere suspicion, but this gains grounds when you watch how Congress uses this 2002 incident for making electoral benefits.

No one need to teach Congress party how to successfully organize a large scale Genocide/riots, they have proved themselves in Delhi Sikh Genocide, Gujarat Riots of 1969, Nelle Massacre of 1983 and so on… More people from the minority community died during the Congress rules. IS congress playing a double Game now also ? Did they play it in 2002 ? Well, their desperation to somehow nail Narendra Modi proves this point.

The media coverage during 2002 was also something worth investigating. Some editors in chiefs boast about their coverage. But has not it helped the rioters to get a reason to riot ? Media always blamed Modi, campaigned against him, calling him mass murderer and calling his voters effete people. The NGOs were always there for Media to supply ammunition against Modi ?

After years of Investigating, SIT have come up with a conclusion that there is no evidence against Narendra Modi and other accused. Should we trust the SIT which is appointed by SC, or these congress-media-ngo combo who are equally responsible for Gujarat 2002? It is for you to decide, and your decision  will decide whether we Indians get an able administrator, no nonsense leader like Narendra Modi  as the Prime Minister of this Nation. !!

TIME 100 Poll : Dirty games by Modi Haters.

Many might not have noticed these stats under Narendra Modi’s image, He has got about 96,000 Likes, about 1500 people directly shared this page from this website, and a thousand others were tweeting about this Poll the whole day. The speciality of FB likes is that, we can like something only once, with our FB account. So we can say, about 96000 have liked @narendramodi and have voted him.

But what about negative voters ? Yes, some Jihadis and sickular extremists who play the politics of hate,had widely campaigned against MODI. Their campaign started the same day when the pro Modi campaign started, But until midnight of 5th April, the Yes to No ratio was 70:30. For three days upto 5th of april, this ratio was same, But during the night of April 5th, some anonymous seems to have helped them.

“Anonymous” is a hacker group, and they were also included in TIME 100 list. Till april 5, they were out of Top 10 and before noon, they came to First position. Obviously, the hackers hacked the poll. But story does not end there..

Both Erik Martin and Anonymous who have got close to NarendraModi’s positive votes have got very less LIKES. More the number of likes means more the number of shares means more the number of votes. But here it went just the opposite. Erik Martin with 2000 likes got more votes than Narendra Modi with 96000 likes. How do you explain this ?

The “Anonymus” votes rose from about 80,000 to 3,90,00 in a single day(april 6), while Modi’s negative votes increased from 90ooo to 266684.That means about 2 Lakh votes which were polled(or hacked?) in favour of anonymus was also polled against Narendra Modi. Does it bring light to your brain ?

 

I never though Narendra Modi will make it to top 3, but I was sure he will be in the top 10 taking into consideration his mass internet followings. I also knew there will be negative campaigning also, but never thought they will play a dirty anonymous game in the end. Let the TIME decide what happens to whom ?

A Hindu POV on freedom of Art and Expression

I remember chatting with a self-declared Liberal, during a fine day when MF Hussain accepted Qatar citizenship. The liberals were shouting, with beating on their chests, and were pleading to him to come back. Hussain knows the economics more than the liberals of India, and he never came back. So that day, I was “abusing” MFH in a social networking site. One secular liberal came and protested my tweets, and I explained to him, freedom of expression is not absolute and there should be reasonable restrictions, and the courts should be allowed to decide whether MFH paintings hurt the Hindu community or not. The liberal said, Freedom of expression is absolute in a democracy and started spaming me with a series of liberal tweets. I asked him then “Shall I paint a porn Portrait of your mom?”. Having heard this from me,he started abusing me, worse than any Bajrangdal activist had abused MFH. And I showed him his own tweets, and asked what happened in MFH issue is the same, He abused with his paintings, Goddesses and Bharatmata, who Hindus consider as their mother.

So there should be reasonable restrictions of freedom of expression. Here in the case of Salman Rushdie, muslims reacted. Those who equate muslim reaction to SR, to that of Hindu reaction to MFH must also explain the difference in reaction. Any community be it Hindus, muslims, Christians, Jews, Communists and “seculars”, will react to people who abuse their Icons. But the reaction, the way they react, and the effect of reaction differ. Let us talk about Muslim Reaction after Salman Rushdie wrote Satanic Verses. I will try to explain it briefly.

As soon as Satanic Verses was published, the supreme Leader of Iran ordered muslims to kill Salman Rushdie, and the Indian Prime Minister banned the Import of the book. The book however was translated to many languages, and the Japanese translater was stabbed to death. The Italian and Norwegian translater survived assassination attempts. Turkish Translater suffered attack in which he survived, but 37 other people killed. In India several places witnessed riots and Hooliganism, the latest was seen in Jaipur, when the fanatics threatened to riot, if the video conference with Rushdie took place in the literary fest.

Having described the muslim reaction to Rushdie, I think it is obvious to you how soft comparatively was the Hindu reaction against MF Hussain. But the liberals are bent on generalizing it as an Indian reaction. Of course, many painting exhibitions were vandalized by Hindu “extremists”, but no one has ever killed anyone in the name of MF Hussain although this was also a communal Issue. It is also MFH, was a Padma Vibhushan, who later ran away from the country saying, “the situation is so legally complicated”.

Liberals and Indian Media, however , are bent upon tarnishing Hindus also for what Muslim orgs did to Rushdie and his fan following. One typical reaction was from Sagarika Ghose who said “Those who protested strenuously against Husain should also protest about insults to all other religions…why double stds? Why Hindu Right up in arms against Husain but not supporting brother religions in their struggle against their own ‘sickulars?’Every muslim group, deoband, aimplb, said husain had indeed insulted religion.why hindu right can’t understand muslim right?”.  What we must understand here is the basic fact that Hindu (Sanathana Dharma) and Semitic religions cannot come to the same side against those who ridicule them. This is because the Abrahamic religion themselves strive, and originated by tarnishing the Hindu faith. Open up any Abrahamic books, be it the Bible or Koran, you can see many passages, in which the God Himself curse/abuse/ridicule the Hindu faith accusing them of Idolators, Polythiests etc. Not only their Books, but the people of those books, also spread their TRUE Religion by tarnishing, twisting hindu Epics and showing them in bad light. That means MFH , who himself was a Muslim, did what a normal mullah do every day, abusing Hindus and non-Muslim faith in whatever way possible. The  Christianity, particularly the evangelists are not much different. So Hindu cause is not just MFH, but the so called religions who tarnish it as a daily affair.

Having said so, if the freedom of Expression is absolute, let me write an article abusing MF Hussain, His personal life. And let us see how liberals react to it  ? If MFH can abuse my Bharatma, Rama , Sita and Hanuman, Is it not my freedom of expression to abuse the abuser ? To conclude, any freedom which is guaranteed by constitution is not absolute, Reasonable restrictions must be imposed. Neither the liberals, nor the offended must decide what is reasonable and what is not. Let the courts of Law decide. And it is not me who is saying so, The Law Says So.

Why blame Hindus for what happened to Rushdie ?

Hindus are a majority in this country. Ram, Sita, Hanuman, Saraswathi and Bharatmata, is worshipped more in India than Allah, Jesus. A person who belonged to a non-Hindu religion, to be specific a Muslim, drawing vulgar pictures of these adored icons of Hindus would certainly hurt their sentiments. They protested, burned his paintings, filed criminal cases against the painter. The painter ran away because he found the situation in India legally complicated.  And portraying himself as a victim of attack against freedom of expression, he lived in foreign countries and sold his paintings and became a billionaire. He never pleaded or expressed desire to come back to India, even the Indian Govt and the entire media requested him to come back.

India is a communally sensitive country, and being a Muslim himself and drawing offensive pictures against Hindu faith, has the capacity to create riots. However, he started painting Hindu Goddesses nude since 1970, and after that twice he was presented Padma Awards by the respective Secular congress government. A person who hurt the majority sentiments is awarded by the government elected by the same majority.

Now we are here talking about Rushdie, while anti Hindu paintings of MFH were never banned in India, Rajiv Gandhi was first prime minister of any country, to ban Satanic Verses. MFH paintings were for everyone to see, and even he described what he painted, but no one read the book called Satanic Verses. Without reading a book, how come anyone conclude that the contents are blasphemous. Has Rajiv Gandhi read his book, or has the supreme leader of Iran who issued fatwa for Rushdie’s head, read the book?

The Indian media and the secular parties are now dragging MFH controversy to give sanctity to Rushdie haters. Hindus have no relation what so ever to Rushdie. Unlike MFH, Rushdie did not express his hatred against a foreign religion, he wrote something about his own religion. Hindus have no reason to love or hate Rushdie. Rushdie and his publishers suffered many attacks and muslims created riots in many part of the world, and that too without reading what he has written.

Finally, Rajasthan Govt played a dirty game by not allowing Rushdie to come to India, and even forcing the organizers of the art fest to cancel video link. Satanic Verses is banned in India, or say import of the book is banned in India, but the author of the book, who is of Indian origin, cannot be stopped from entering this country under any law ? Hindus must remember, the double standards of the congress party, which gave high civilian honours to a Hindu abuser, but stopped even the virtutal presence of rushdie. And for all these hooliganism by muslim fanatics, Hindus are being blamed. When will this kolaveri end?

To conclude, MFH also should have come back to India, and faced the court cases, he ran away like a coward, and the same Indian media made him a hero because he ran away? The same people are blaming Hindus for what happens to Rushdie.

Dear Subscribers,please note..

Dear Friends and well wishers,

 

For several personal reasons, am shifting my Primary blog to http://nationaliser.blogspot.com , and this blog  will NOT be deleted .But here I will post my views on daily happenings in national politics and religion.. Also you need not unsubscribe this as I will be posting links to my research articles, here also. At the same time i request you to subscribe me on, http://nationaliser.blogspot.com also ..

 

thanks for your support

VandeMataram

My defense of Dr Swamy

An FIR has been filed against Dr.Subrahmanian Swamy for what he wrote on DNA op-ed titled “How to wipe out Islamic terror”. He was criticized by many secular and leftists outfits and even a petition against him was filed in Harvard where he is teaches for summer school. The Harvard rejected the petition and now has invited Dr Swamy to teach there, next summer. Dr. Swamy who is on a crusade against all 2G scamsters had already hinted that the corrupt may plan to arrest or file an FIR against him on the grounds of that article, and that has happened last evening when Delhi Police which is under the direct control of Home Minister. This comes a day after Dr. Swamy hinted that Robert Vadra is his next target.

Dr Swamy called this FIR against him foolish. Examining his tweets as replies to many of his followers reveals how he will argue the case. He said “Patriotic tweeters can learn some law by researching what are the ingredients of IPC Sections 153A&B, 295A, and 505 and compare with DNA” also asked people to go through Nehru 1948 speech, and also argued why not Quran and Bible not be banned on the same grounds. This article of mine is an attempt to form an argument on the defence of Dr. Swamy.

It seems like the FIR was filed against him quoting following sections of Indian Penal code..

153A : Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony whoever By words, either spoken or written, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or

153B: Makes or publishes any imputation that any class of persons cannot, by reason or their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, bear true faith and allegiance to Constitution of India as by law established or uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, or

295A. Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs. — Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of 2[citizens of India], 3[by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations

505: With intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community.

Let me start my argument by exposing the timing of the FIR.

For the sake of argument let us first presume that Dr. Swamy wrote an “inflammatory” article, after July 13 Mumbai blasts which was carried out by Islamic terrorists. But the fact is that it was not on July 17^th that this opinion of Dr. Swamy got published in a national English daily. In fact, The Indian express on May 31st 2010 carried a similar article, titled “How to wipe out Islamic terror: The Moment of Truth Has Arrived”. Also he has spoken many a times in various functions the same words what he has wrote , and that would have reached more than an English daily in India can reach. So the point is, Dr Swamy, has wrote and spoke, which we presume is an inflammatory article, many times in the past. The question which arises when we realize this fact, is that why no FIR was filed against Dr Swamy for the article he wrote on May last year? Does the delhi police or any one concerned, think Indian Express do not have much audience like DNA? Or was the article or speeches did not contain any words which Swamy has used in the present inflammatory article. So let me first of all, state without any doubt, that the timing of this FIR has more to do with events going on now in political circles. Not many days ago, Dr Swamy in Supreme Court argued against Mr. Chidambaram, the Home Minister, on his role in 2G spectrum scam, and the case is to continue on October 12^th. Also this FIR comes a day after media and public at large came to know about Dr Swamy’s letter to prime minister, on prosecuting Sonia Gandhi, UPA chief. It needed only 24 hours for Delhi Police, to file an FIR, for an article written about a couple of months ago, when they heard Dr Swamy said to media that Robert Vadra is his next target. So this exposes the Delhi Police and those who control them.

Let me argue now, Why only Dr Swamy ?

This time too, let us not stop presuming that Dr. Swamy wrote an inflammatory article, but let me quote some other people who have said more which adversely affect the unity and integrity of India. Let me start with Arundathi Roy who at the convention on “Azadi–The Only Way” sharing the stage with hardline Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and pro-Maoist leader Vara Vara Rao, said “Kashmir has never been an integral part of India. It is a historical fact. Even the Indian government has accepted this.” This statement was made in the capital city of India, and only after court’s intervention Delhi police charged an FIR. Arundathi Roy is not yet arrested and still she speaks at various functions for Kashmir Azadi. Agnivesh, MF Hussain, Geelani, etc are many among the few who has insulted Hindu faith but no action was taken against them.

Now let us keep the individuals away, and have a look at article 295A and 505 in context of religions, viz Islam and Christianity. There was a case registered against Koran, in Kolkata, long back, in which the petitioner called it a book which spread terror against Hindus. Many statements in Koran are explicitly against the Hindu faith and culture. I may quote a few to substantiate what I said.. “2/39 and those who disbelieve and deny our signs – those will be companions of the Fire; they will abide therein eternally.” And also “3/28 Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers.” Also much used quotes by terrorists across the world “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush” is from Koran. So either Koran should be edited thoroughly as it spreads enmity or is a source of spreading hatred in the minds of people, both Hindus and Muslims. Many Hindus and Muslims too are killed in the name of Islam, so , if Dr. Swamy article invite an FIR, then we will also have to reintroduce the forgotten Calcutta Koran petition. The Christianity by engaging the acts of conversion, invites riots and clashes between tribal community, while Indian muslims are brainwashed by Wahabi Islam which is not much different from any other Islam.

Now, About Swamy’s article, is it inflammatory ?

Let me show you why Section 153 A (Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) , cannot be applied in Dr Swamy article FIR. Swamy uses “Hindus” and “muslims” but, he explicitly wrote what he mean by “Hindu”. He has included millions of muslims, under this name when he says “If any Muslim acknowledges his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj (greater Hindu society) which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and others whose ancestors were Hindus”. Hindu is not defined in a religious way, but in a geographical way, just like the historic judgment of Supreme Court, Hindutva is not about religion, it is not communal, it is nationalism. History teaches us about the attempts made by Islamic rulers, to islamise India, although they failed to much extent. The atrocities by Babar, Aurangazeb and even Akbar, itself is a proof of how Hindus had to suffer under Islamic rule. So these two well defined facts 1) Hindutva , is not in a religious context and 2) Islamic terrorism was, is and will be a reality , only rubbishes the charges made against Swamy. In fact Dr Swamy’s article was his opinion on how to fight Islamic terrorism, and every Individual has the right to express his views.

Section 295 A (Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.) is another baseless charge. Does the Delhi police or the petitioner, think if someone writes an article against his thoughts on strategy to counter Islamic terrorism, it will be anti Muslim ? Dr Swamy, nowhere tells anywhere in his article, to kill, to cause any injury, to defame, to demolish any mosque. So where did he insult the muslim feelings ?Does insulting the terrorist mean, he is insulting the muslims ? Now there is a propaganda that Swamy asked Hindus to “demolish” 300 mosques. When we read the article carefully we can see the word “removed” and not “demolish” has been used in the article. (Karsevaks demolished, Sardar Patel removed the mosque). Another charge against Dr Swamy is that he said muslims should not be given right to vote. What he said was only this “Others, who refuse to acknowledge this(Hindu ancestry) , or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration, can remain in India but should not have voting rights”. Muslims who do not have any roots in India should not have voting rights. This can be his opinion, but most of the muslims in India have Hindu roots, and even Jawaharlal Nehru in his speech in 1948 states this fact. So what is wrong , if a muslim acknowledges Hindu ancestry ?

The other, so called “inflammatory” comments, like on conversion, uniform civil code has also been views of Mahatma Gandhi too. Gandhi was against conversions, and even said, if he had the power,he would have banned it. Uniform Civil code is one of the directive principle of state policy, and also many such points he made was valid points. To conclude, I would like to say, whether this article is inflammatory or not, the timing is much more important. There were no riots or a single violence in the name of this article and that itself proves the charge against Dr Swamy are baseless. This FIR is an attempt by some corrupt people who fear Swamy will expose them. So I request honourable court to reject these charges against Dr Swamy.  

Also read.. swamy-called-a-spade-a-spade

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hate begets hate

 

 

“Digvijay Singh on Thursday approached the Delhi Police with a complaint against the hate mail, objectionable pictures and abusive comments posted against him on social networking sites. He named 22 people and eight websites. Sources said some people have used “defamatory language against Singh or have posted phrases talking about his character”. In his complaint, Digvijay Singh said the content on the internet has caused “acute mental pain and agony to him, his family members, friends and colleagues. The same is also causing grave damage and injury to the reputation, goodwill and image of the Congress”.

This was reported by Times of India, in their website, what was hilarious to see was the same article which reported this news was welcomed by the readers with more and more abuses which Digvijaya would have never seen in the websites which he complained it caused “acute mental pain and agony”. Will quote some of the abuses, here to just let you know how people hate Digvijaya.

One said “if large number of public write against this Digvijay singh then they is something wrong with this fellow. This guy should resign from his post” while another said “Doggy now you know where you stand so do not bark next especially against Baba Ramdev and Anna Hazare. If you bark you will get more hate mails.” A girl joked “Breaking News: – Animal Rights Activists are planning to file a case against hundreds of times of India viewers for insulting animals like dog and pig by calling them diggy, digvijay, etc.”. Another guy said “Diggy should file a complaint against the internet”. These were a few of 500 comments, which got published in TOI website. Please note that I only quoted a few not so abusive comments. I am sure,if he happens to see this, the already mentally pained Digvijaya will get a acute heart pain too. If this was how people responded to the TOI, the hate against Digvijay does not stop there too. Just see for yourself by typing “Digvijaya Singh is a” and wait for Google to fill it. Then you will get results like “Digvijaya Singh is a dog/pig/b@$ “.

Digvijay Singh is not the only hated man in the virtual world. Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi are also hated by Hindutva circles in Internet, so is Narendra Modi hated in Islamic and secular circles. But fortunately and unfortunately, in twitter and other social networking sites the former dominates. Hindutva people, or to put it in Sagarika Ghose’s words “tweeters controlled from Nagpur” and “Internet Hindus”, have every reasons to hate, although the use of abusing language is a subject of another debate. The same journalist in the past has argued for regulating and monitoring these “Internet Hindus”. It is to be noted that Digvijaya Singh came to know about the abuses hurled at him only after he joined twitter, and the question is who introduced him to twitter ; the same journalist who see a threat in “Hindu Terrorism” like Digvijay.

Why is Digvijaya so much hated among Hindutva circles ? The reasons are obvious, his wild allegations against RSS, calling Mumbai Terror attacks as “RSS ki Sajish”, his foolish rants of calling every Congress critic as RSS agent, Endorsing of Rahul Gandhi as future prime minister, his visits to relatives of terrorists who were killed in Batla house encounter to mention a few. Has Digvijaya ever thought what mental agony would have been suffered by the people and organisations who were victims of his baseless allegations. Instead of filing complaints against infinite number of his abusers in the virtual world, he should have sat in a room, interospect about why he is so much hated by people? He very well knows no one needs to further politically malign him, as he has finished the Congress party in the very state where he was once upon a time, the chief minister.

Having said this, I would also like to share, my view that, the internet users, must control their language, because, that only helps the liberal, self-claimed seculars to portray us as “dangerous” “uncultured” and “extremists”. We need to criticize them heavily, no doubt, but there is a lot of difference between abuse and criticism. This is not about freedom of thoughts, because we are living in a country, where criticizing the head of a political party automatically makes you a product of RSS shakas. So every abuses you type, will only help them to defame RSS and the entire Sangh Pariwar, to whom you might have never associated to.

The Cow and Congress

“Gujarat government under Narendra Modi today introduced a bill which ensures a seven-year jail term for cow slaughter instead of six months as at present. The bill was passed unopposed on second day of two-day monsoon session of Gujarat assembly today with Congress extending support to it.”
Read here

What interested me is not the news; particularly BJP tries to ban cow slaughter in all the states where they have government. But the words unopposed and congress extending support to it surprised me.I did a little Googling on this and found these facts..

SC upholds Gujarat cow slaughter ban (2005)

“In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the 1994 ban imposed on cow slaughter by the then Congress government in Gujarat.”

So it was congress who was first to ban the slaughtering of cows in Gujarat. This “love” for cows do not stop there..

Vaghela for cheaper petrol,stringent law protecting cow (2011)

“Similarly we will bring stringent law for cow/buffalo protection. Any vehicle and person involved in bovine trafficking meant for slaughter will stay in jail for a year and his vehicle used in illegal trafficking will also remain seized for a year long time,” Vaghela said.

So Gujarat Congress has always supported ban on cow slaughter, and they are even supporting the “maut ka saudagar” in this….!

Let us Google outside Gujarat.

Karnataka

Cow slaughter ban bill passed in Karnataka Assembly

After more than a four-hour debate, the Cow slaughter ban Bill was passed by voice-vote as the entire opposition — Congress and JDS — trooped into the well of the House and shouted anti-government slogans, branding the BJP government “communal”. Leader of Opposition Siddaramaiah, who termed the legislation “draconian”, “anti-secular” and “unconstitutional” tore a copy of the Bill and threw it in the air.

So much anger? In Karnataka , the ban on cow slaughtering is anti-secular, draconian, unconstitutional etc….

Madhya Pradesh

Some quotes on cow slaughter

“No person could kill cows, nor get them killed. No person could hand over cows for slaughter, nor could get it done by others. If found guilty, such persons will be awarded three years’ imprisonment and will have to pay a fine of up to Rs 10,000 or be awarded both,” a government (uma Bharathi BJP ) release said.

“The Congress banned cow slaughter in Madhya Pradesh way back in 1959. In fact, 18 states banned cow slaughter under Congress rule. “: Digvijay Singh

But it seems now the central Government have some confusions regarding to support this or not…

The state BJP government has agreed to reduce the jail term for cow slaughter to seven years from the proposed 10 years after the Central government said it was too harsh.

So congress is at present, in a confused position on cow slaughter ban in Madhya Pradesh..

So we have three congress in India, one who support slaughter of cows, second which support the ban of slaughter of cows and third which is confused about “to ban or not to ban“.

.Click to see related news links

Open letter to PM of India

Dear PM of India,

Err, let me start by informing you that I am an aam aadmi, in whose name your government has come into power, so I do not know how to write an official letter to the Prime Minister of this great nation, forgive me if you feel this letter of mine is “immature“. Let me come to topic.

2009 was the first General election which I first exercised my right as a citizen to vote a party to government. Do not in your weirdest dreams, think that I voted for you, but now I feel very proud that I did not vote for you. Now please do not call Digvijaya to know whether I am an RSS terrorist. There are a million others who did not vote for your government. Now, I only wanted to give an Idea about my age, which is one fourth of your age and half the age of “youth icon” Rahul Baba. Hope you could calculate my age now, as there is a rumour around that you have got a doctorate in economics.

So I heard that you are on a foreign official tour, in United Nations building, I don’t know where it is. I saw a speech of Isreal Prime Minister speaking a day before you opened your divine mouth. Let me tell you frankly, I was impressed that there exist a country in the world whose Prime Minister defends the nationalism of its majority population. I heard in middle of his speech, he asked something like, “have you no shame” , do not get hurt when I ask you this, was that question directed to you ?

Israel is not my motherland, but India is. I was wondering what my PM will speak at united nations, because no one, literally no one, in my family or my friends family understand when you speak. I was really wondering why people choose you again, or did you really rig the evms ? Err, I again forgot that you are not elected, in fact people defeated you in some past elections, and Sonia selected you. But there is absolutely nothing which technology cannot decode, and I read in some newspaper that, you have supported Palestine state? Also You said something like “selective approach to terrorism”, for Gods sake, can you explain what did you mean by that?

I am not very much informed about the crisis in Palestine, but I know about Kashmir. My brothers were driven out, some were murdered, and their temples were desecrated by the separatist a few decades ago. You have not spoken a word about that? What gives you the authority to speak about an Issue regarding foreign countries, when you do not dare to speak about the issues concerning the majority population, Let me remind you what you said some years ago. You made a great secular speech “First right to Indian resources belong to Muslims”. Can you explain what the hell did you mean by it?

Ever since the person who selected you for the TOP JOB is ill, I see you frequently talking to media with funny expressions. My little bro made a great mess in my home, for not allowing to see you speak, because he thought it is some Mickey Mouse show in cartoon network. Please do not send NSG commandos to my home now, forgive my little Brother. Then , I saw in the news that you said, “My ministers enjoy my confidence”. Who in the world cares about who enjoy your confidence, even you made a somewhat similar statement an year ago Raja went to Tihar. Now Raja has become famous in Tihar and in the end it seems you also will have to share Raja’s cell in Tihar ?

I know this was the day when you were incarnated in to this world, to save the corrupts. Also I heard you are celebrating your birthday in New York. Look at your wife, a similar looking lady died today in India. She was beaten midnight by your Delhi Police which is directly under the minister who enjoys your confidence? It was unfortunate as you said, and we do not need your certificate to call an incident unfortunate, but when you said, there was no option, I was really observing your better half who looks like Rajbala. If your wife understands your language, ask her about this someday!

Yet I hear people calling you, Honest. Then I was reminded of Shakespeare play “Julius Caesar” and the famous speech of Antony “Yet Brutus is an Honourable man”.

Not thanking you,

Yours unfaithfully

Aam Aadmi