my judgement on ayodhya verdict.Posted: October 1, 2010
first read the ayodhya verdict and then read my take on it !!!!
“The area covered under the central dome of the disputed structure is the birthplace of Lord Rama as per faith and belief of Hindus”. As I heard this and I was jumping with joy as if I am one party to the case , indeed I am , because I am a hindu who was also saying for years the same what honourable court just declared. In the panel of three judges two of them ditto the above sentence , while one say “Hindus started identifying the premises in dispute as exact birth place of Lord Ram”, but when u speak of final judgement majority matters and in this particular issue of historicity of the place of birth of sri rama is hence proved by honourable court of allahabad and hindu right to the place is upheld !!!!
Now I logged on into internet as it seemed to me that the “india first” media is actually trying to interpret the judgement in a wrong and confusing way, I saw the details well documented in the offficial RJBM.nic.in website (Rama Janma Bhoomi Mandir), then I saw this “The building in dispute was constructed after demolition of Non- Islamic religious structure, i.e., a Hindu temple.” It added to my emotions , but I did control and went on reading all the judges views on this! Here also 2 of the panel of judges say there was a mandir and it was destroyed to built the disputed structure , while one say “No temple was demolished for constructing the mosque.Mosque was constructed over the ruins of temples which were lying in utter ruins since a very long time before the construction of mosque and some material thereof was used in construction of the mosque”. !! This is the second victory of hindus as far as the hindu stand on “temple demolition theory by mughals “ is concerned !!
I did not stop and went out to celebrate , I continued reading the judgement, and I saw this ” the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?” I do not exactly know what is the stand of the plantiff in this issue , but I also believe this judgement, but I thank those who kept it because , it only strengthened the case even if their mischief was caught!! Court , by the end of the day ,did not say that the idols do not deserve that particular place , called ram janmasthan !! So this was actually a pat on hindu shoulders , and we need not get hurt by this loving pat !!! I will call this triumph to hindu view on “it is not the way , but truth that matters” philosophy.
Now the judgement part actually doesnot exactly match with the observations by honourable high court. It is in all ways proved by the three of the judges that it is a Ramjanmabhoomi , and hindus have right to worship there , and muslims do not have anything “holy” to this particular structure. But even then 1:1:1 logic of judges seemed quite interesting. Although hindus got what they want that is “the portion below the central dome where at present the idol is kept in makeshift temple “ and “Ram Chabutra” and “Sita Rasoi” went to Nirmohi Akhara, a group of hindu naga sanyasis, in total 1.8 we got acres of land, 0.9 acres of land was also given to suni wakf board. The logic of this is not understandable though , I stand that hindus are the one who are extremely satisfied with the verdict , because we got the place which we wanted, now even if we want to have the third part used for the construction of grand ram mandir , we can very well discuss with wakf board (or local muslims?) in exchange to any other site which is far away.
What hindus needed,we indeed got it. And we can build a ram mandir , which we were hoping all the time since the date of demolition of hindu temple complex during mughal rule (after 3 months,if there is no stay, but the stay is obvious as the unsatisfied party has gone for appeal ) , now according to shariah law of muslims , can they construct a mosque near a hindu idol worship place ?? I think islam do not permit it, even if we have mathura and kashi as exceptions.(mosques which are anti islamic). Hindus I do not think will object to mosque near the temple , but it should be made clear that no mosque in the name of babar, the destroyer , will be allowed to built , and as I always said , indian muslims are not the descendents of babar and sons pvt ltd.
Now finally let me judge the so called “disputed structure” (called babri masjid by many secularists and marxists to exploit muslim sentiments and thus gain their votebank) demolition in karseva. I want you all to just imagine for a moment , that if that “structure” existed today after this verdict came out ? now could we ever demolish the ugly structure to built a beautiful ram mandir at a place called ram janmabhoomi (by all judges unanimously) which is occupied by this structure ?. Now come to reality that the “structure” is no more and so we should actually congratulate the karsevaks of 1992 , who did it with perfection , and made it easy to the judiciary and legislature of this country to let the justice prevail. The sentiments of muslims were exploited and the riots that took place are frameworks of people who brainwashed them. And the situation would have been worse if that situation prevailed today.LK Advani, who always said he is proud to be part of ramjanmabhoomi of ayodhya deserves appreciation and praise at this point of time. Also vishwa hindu parishad and hindu mahasabha and sangh are and were always part of the movement and we are honoured when the honourable court of india echoed what we were saying for decades.
Now , sunni wakf board who are ‘partially‘ (actually 2/3rd) dissatisfied by the judgement , is going to appeal to supreme court and let us all hope the verdict of the supreme court will be soooner and same . But it is time to remember sardar patel who using legislature , re built the somnath temple in gujrat in 1950 , (which was destroyed by foreign islamic kings , centuries ago) ! tThere were no protest , nor there were “india first campaigns” , the somnath issue was closed within months by that able leader, the iron man of india. Had Chacha nehru heard patels formula of ayodhya too , the history of india would have been different ?
Now the media which carried the campaigns (to increase their TRP ,ofcourse ) like “india first”, “madhusha unity” should understand that india has moved on. If last decade was the destruction of the disputed structure (which is no longer in dispute) , this decade will indeed see the construction of a grand ram mandir in ayodhya! In that way we shall say india has moved from “destruction” to “construction”. Soul of bharat is hinduism and you can not kill the soul as per bhagavad gita !! Those hindus who do not want ram mandir in ayodhya can chose not to visit the temple when it is actually built , but please do not spoil the dreams of those who want it, do not spoil the dreams of the muslim community in ayodhya , who will be very much beniffited if it turns as a hindu piligrimage centre. The secularism will see new heights when you see a muslim tailor like babu khan of ayodhya weaving the cloths of Sri Ram Lalla who is virajman in the Virat Ram Mandir Of Ayodhya. Let the wounds heal this way and beware of the media and pseudo secular politians fooling my muslim brothers of india!!
Thanks for reading my views on ayodhya verdict.
!! सत्यमेवजयते !!
Truth alone triumphs
Jai sri Ram !!
Vande Mataram !!