Azad on Nehru and Patel

Today(11th November) is Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad’s Birth Anniversary. He was a  scholar and a senior political leader of the Indian independence movement. Following India’s independence, he became the first Minister of Education in the Indian government. In 1992 he was posthumously awarded India’s highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna. This blog post is about his views and narratives about Sardar Patel, Gandhi and Nehru which he has expressed in his autobiography named “India Wins Freedom”.

What inspired me to go through his autobiography, frankly I must admit, is not because I love or adore him, but because of some recent controversies in Indian politics. Not many days ago, Narendra Modi and Man Mohan Singh shared dais on the occasion of commemorating Sardar Patel’s Birth Anniversary. Narendra Modi spoke about how visionary Sardar Patel was and also said ““Had Sardar Vallabbhai Patel been the country’s first prime minister, India’s fortunes would have been completely different from what it is now.” Manmohan Singh read a prepared speech, but it was interpreted as a retort to Modi’s speech, he said “Sardar Patel was secular. People of all religions were his friends. Sardar Patel was a deputy prime minister in Nehru’s cabinet. They might have differences but they used to respect each other a lot. ” “Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Patel and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad taught us to respect all people even if their ideologies were different. Today there is dearth of these thoughts and I believe everyone present on this dais will do a self-assessment about it,” the prime minister said. “Sardar Patel always dreamed of an united India with a secular outlook. Patel has inspired us with his works,”  (source: firstpost) Today, may be due to their fear of Narendra Modi and BJP hijacking another congress leader, Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, UPA has launched a website on him.

While on twitter, some Narendra Modi fans were circulating some screenshot from Azad’s autobiography saying that he too was Anti Nehru and supportive of Sardar Patel.  Following are those screenshots :

1. MAK Azad, like Modi, wished Had he not made the mistake of choosing Nehru over Patel as his successor  , history would have been different.

2. MAK Azad also thought that it was Lady Mountbatten who influenzed Nehru to change his stance on Partition

The above are two instances in the book by Azad, where he seems to be quite critical about Nehru. But that does not however, suggest that, he was an admirer of Sardar Patel. As far as I read the book, it is more about criticism of Sardar Patel than anything else. I will  post more screen grabs from the books to prove it.

1. Sardar Patel had communal demands 

Embedded image permalink

2.Sardar Patel was founder of Indian Partition

3. Patel believed that Hindus and Muslims can not be united into one nation. Hence he thought partition is the best solution to communal problems.

4. Sardar Patel influenced Gandhi to agree on Partition. 

5. Sardar Patel believed that partition is the only true solution to then existing circumstances of India

6. Sardar Patel,according to MAK Azad, would not have been sorry if Muslims who followed Muslim League suffered.

Embedded image permalink

7. Sardar Patel did not pay any attention to complaints by Muslims

8. Sardar Patel prejudices about muslims ?

9. Heated conversation between Sardar and Gandhi on the issue of atrocities against muslims

10.  Sardar Patel said to MAK Azad that Gandhiji seemed to be determined to blacken the names of Hindus before the whole world. 

11. Many congress leaders accused Sardar Patel for not providing enough security to Gandhi which resulted in his death

12. Sardar Patel’s reaction to his critics on Gandhi assassination

13.  Sardar felt deeply shocked and humiliated after Gandhi Assasination : It affected his health also.

I started reading the book hoping for some anti Nehru stuff, but ended up in getting some anti Sardar stuff from Maulana Azad’s autobiography. Although I adore Sardar Patel, it was very interesting to read how other leaders in congress saw him. I fear it is Narendra Modi who occupies the political space of Sardar Patel today.

Just go through the allegations against Sardar Patel, be it his autocratic nature, be it the “communal” mindset, be it his indifference to muslims, we can see the same set of allegations being hurled against the Gujarat chief minister and the Prime ministerial candidate of BJP. It is not coincidence that Modi saw a hero in Sardar, i guess it is because he saw his own life in him.

For UPA, my humble advice is not to secularize Sardar Patel much, he did not practice the secularism of Nehru and Gandhi and Azad, but much the no nonsense secularism of Modi.

6 thoughts on “Azad on Nehru and Patel

  1. In your last para, you are repeating the same anti-modi propaganda in a brand new way by equalizing Modi and Patel. Seems like you have never visited Gujarat where religion based discrimination is almost dead.
    From the current situation, anybody can see that Muslims still demand separate state. May be S. Patel predicted the same in 1947. I agree the decision wasn’t best & partition was the biggest mistake ever done. Great to know that Maulana Azad was lot concerned about it, but couldn’t help & more than 5 Lac died during partition. (excuse me for a weak english)

  2. Interesting read indeed. Thanks for taking the trouble to put the selected pages. It looks like Sardar, though not anti-muslim, was certainly not very secular. Instead of being concerned about the human tragedy, he seemed more worried about the ‘image’ of hindus across the world. Leaders of the stature of Gandhi and Nehru clearly rued the human tragedy while Sardar seemed to think of it as “inevitable part of the deal (partition)”.

    That’s the problem with autocratic leaders are they do not accept mistakes well and go to great lengths to promote their ideology. And problems for their supporters and themselves is that all this may appear communal or fascist or anti-something.

  3. i wud rather appreciate his deed tat he found the neccessity of partition way back…look at the current scenario of pak…fighting within and killing each othr..

  4. first of all thanx 4 providing me this valuabl information.
    i’ll Patel sahab’s side he did exactly right, to protect your land nd your people is not crime, nd muslims were not innocent, they deserved that what happens with them,

    nd wats wrong if modi consider patel sahab as his hero,
    modi ko Pm ban na hi chahiye, warna 20 sal bad hindustan poora berbad ho jayega or jo kch aaj kashmir me ho raha h wo sb Delhi me hoga bcz hamari govt ko vote bank ki politics k alawa kch ni ata.

Your views please...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s